Characteristics of a positive DevSecOps Culture

June 15, 2021

iauro Team

Contributing immensely to the global software solutions ecosystem. DevOps | Microservices | Microfrontend | DesignThinking LinkedIn

Security is ingrained

Developers think more about security the way they think about deployment when writing software. With DevSecOps, developers don’t do insecure things. Developers are more likely to want to talk to security personnel to come up with a good design. Security is about engineering to get feedback and determine the best ways to work. Security works in partnership with developers to develop security features. Consider risks versus business value.

Implementation of a proactive safety mentality in every team. Develop, design and test in a sandbox. Operators work with safety in mind. Product management thinks about safety. Automate if possible. People don’t scale. Look for ways to use automation to perform low-value repetitive tasks. Take a small approach. Pick a few key goals and celebrate small victories to keep people excited and everyone can see the progress.

As the use of containers evolves, enterprises that benefit from deploying containers in CI / CD pipelines are realizing the importance of securing their application container development environments from start to finish. Whereas DevOps may not have added security until mid-development in the past, there is now a cultural shift towards DevSecOps, where security and DevOps teams work together to “move left”: implement built-in security from the start of the development life cycle. At the same time, businesses are pushing container technology beyond landfills and into production. These living, containerized production environments need to be protected, which also requires a shift to the right. As a result, the culture of DevOps teams is now typically shifting towards a DevSecOps mindset, encompassing security solutions specifically designed to protect containerized environments throughout the lifecycle of an application launched during build and launch.

A positive DevOps culture is a culture in which security is a means, not an obstacle, to delivering good things. Usually, people want to be safe until it gets difficult. Simplify important security tasks. Thread safety in all your processes. It is not the job of the central security team to make sure that developers write good code. Developers should strive to write secure code to excel in their roles. Learning about secure coding, secure functioning, secure implementation, etc. Should be integral to success in the position, not good knowledge.

Striving for excellence Security is critical to modern applications, but often invisible to the client and other developers. Without a culture of best practice, teams may be forced to quickly implement a less secure solution instead of wasting time implementing a secure and maintainable solution

Extensive automation With automated deployment processes, security testing can be performed throughout the development pipeline. Automation ensures that security requirements and testing are always consistently met. Manual security processes lead to delays and often motivate people to look for ways to get around them.

Security best practices must be carefully applied at every stage of the DevOps chain.

  1.  Get speed and agility. Automated safety decisions are made at great speed.
  2. Fostering a culture of safety. Change safety culture with greater awareness of all stages of the SDLC. Developers place more emphasis on risk rather than value.
  • You need to take care. You should know that you are living in a world where actors and nation states are hacking everything they can — democratizing malevolent actors. DevSecOps must understand how easy it is to hack.
  • Think about how to make security a part of the process in advance, in every line of code and automation. This is everyone’s responsibility.

At the point when everybody in the group considers wellbeing to be their duty and not another person’s concern, you foster a positive DevSecOps culture. This is reflected in the fact that security is part of every criterion for completing the user story in advance, that security testing is an integral part of the continuous integration pipeline and production environment, and also support from management and the understanding that security should not be delivered. Compromised to shorten time to market.


Developers, Ops, SecOps go into a steady state. If the tools slow down delivery, they will not be integrated into the pipelines. Have tools that don’t require much attention, that don’t need to be managed every day. DevOps cannot work with products that require a lot of management. Everyone is concerned about security. It is impossible to ignore security.

A positive DevSecOps culture is when there is trust and shared responsibility for security outcomes. This culture must be guided by shared security KPIs and fueled by engaging the right people who recognize the value and interconnected nature of DevSecOps, which is at the heart of automation. Another key attribute of a positive DevSecOps culture is that security always strives to reduce friction in agile DevOps processes.

A positive DevSecOps culture is built on collaboration and mutual trust. Without these two characteristics, development and security teams continue to operate in silos, unaware of or oblivious to the needs and goals of their peers. This division leads to a model of “throwing things over the wall” and creates frustration in the team, who may feel discounted or stumped by their peers. In contrast, teams that work closely together to achieve common business goals are more likely to leverage their unique strengths and avoid traditional conflicts.

1) Integration of development, security, and operations is best initiated through collaboration and shared goals between developers, security teams, and operations personnel.

2) Shared goals, collaborative working environment with openness and transparency from the earliest stages of development.

3) “Shameless retrospectives” allowing developers, security personnel, and SREs to learn from each other’s mistakes.

4) Continuous learning and the ability to initiate and reinforce cultural change. One way to think about safety is to express quality: Is the system doing what it should (and not what it shouldn’t)? Engineering practices that lead to good quality also lead to good safety. The more you see that security is woven into the team’s day-to-day engineering work, rather than being seen as a one-off, the more successful the team’s security efforts will be.

  • A successful DevSecOps strategy requires a team of players across multiple roles, including development, IT operations, and security. It is a collaborative and inclusive movement that encourages people to work with other teams and go beyond traditional channels and includes automation and orchestration to make it easier for them to work together.
  • However, security has traditionally been viewed as a barrier to speed and innovation, working separately from developers and IT teams due to cultural and sometimes language differences. Just as individual work is not a successful field strategy, it will not work in DevSecOps, and the team you build can either lead you to success or get stuck on the way and fall short of expectations.

Measurement / Vision

You start making data-driven risk decisions. The security team will hold a meeting to show how the exploit works. With DevSecOps, you no longer need to hold a meeting, you just focus on the data on how the infection happened and provide recommendations and updates on how to fix the problem. Let’s not meet. Here’s the problem, here’s the solution, just keep going.

Key attributes of a positive DevSecOps culture are the dimension of security at every stage of the development lifecycle. As the saying goes, if something is not measured, then it cannot be improved. Having a safety-centered design culture among all stakeholders helps to identify and prevent problems early.

A positive DevSecOps culture is one where :
1) Everyone, from leaders to project teams, shares the same opinion about the importance of security.
2) The emphasis is on the partnership, not blame.
3) The security workload is shared across multiple teams.
4) There are clear metrics based on security (MTTR, time to transition from development to product, speed of evading vulnerabilities).
5) The software is designed for security (fault tolerant defaults, defense in depth).
6) Security team is invited to the autopsy.
7) Business interests are governed by the SDLC through compliance and risk requirements.

In addition to the obvious – close collaboration between departments, a willingness to learn, and alignment of common goals – it is important to develop a culture of visibility. Security practice is nothing more than development practice. Just as the development culture has benefited immensely from shared code repositories, code pipelines, code reviews, and sprint demos, security teams must create both formal and informal channels to share ideas, techniques, and implementations with their peers in both the field. security and development. Security teams must also leverage the GitOps mindset to support their security and automation tests, capitalizing on the collaboration and multiple enhancements made possible by taking security out of the box.


This is more than the inclusion of security or open source scans that are part of the CI / CD toolkit. Realize that non-functional requirement can be automated. If you need to create a threat model, you can do it manually, just include it as part of the process. If you wait until the end of the things you’ve discovered, you’ll want to fix security issues early on so that you don’t have to re-architect or completely change your approach to the problem. Incorporate steps into the process at every step, threat modeling, scanning, make the whole team reliable as they move forward.

It is a mistake to think that culture is the most important thing. The most important part is technology. A culture of safety cannot exist without technology. Our culture is a networking culture. He leaves without technology. We are building a culture by creating the Internet and everything related to it. We live in a networked culture. We have created an object-oriented programming culture. If we remove this, we will return to Cobalt and start a rebellion. If testing takes many hours, how fast will you get? No one. Culture is built on the basis of existing technologies. You must start with the right technology to test it quickly and ensure fast delivery. If the test takes eight hours, you can’t have quick releases. You cannot create a culture of communication if you have no means of communication. Manual code verification is not a substitute for automated testing. This myth is the reason DevSecOps is still frustrated. Don’t get the myth. Culture is a follower, not a leader.

Faster speed, higher quality. It took a while to convince doubters about the need for automated testing in the CI / CD pipeline. Not all testing can be fully automated, but mostly silly bugs can be found much faster, and manual deep penetration testing becomes more interesting. Automated tools now flag bad code or new open source vulnerabilities. When testing applications, you can focus on more complex tests.

Ensure true separation of duties and integrity. InfoSec has built-in data protections and good developer and developer processes to develop good code.

We are seeing the collapse of the infrastructure technology stack. The move to DevSecOps is challenging organizations to break down barriers and simplify the technology stack to reap the benefits of the transition. DevSecOps is a four-team project in which teams wear different hats.

1. Rather than saying no, a positive DevSecOps culture is responding to security challenges by taking a well-paved path – open/closed source solutions that are developer-friendly and implemented in a way that is easy to implement.
2. DevSecOps works best by anticipating the security needs of DevOps and providing a “paved path” for building applications securely within programmatic policy. DevSecOps teams should also provide clear guidelines that will enable DevOps teams to build their security-compliant solutions if these barriers are too tight.

Understanding its importance for data protection. In this brave new world of distributed data in virtualized environments of limited existence, new access points will be created that will continue to challenge the ability of security teams to detect and protect.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe for updates